Robert Kleijweg
Yacht Designer | Naval Architect | Engineer
Founder Robert Kleijweg has a bachelor degree in naval architecture, graduated in 1990 at the Polythechnik Institute in Haarlem, and started his career in software developement and production of stability documentation for a variety of vessels.
A special interest for hull design, with respect to resistance, propulsion, and stability, for many different types of vessels, from sailing yachts, planing motor yachts up to container carriers, has made him an expert in the market.
Kleijweg Design was founded in 1997 in Haarlem. After a short period the company moved to Enkhuizen in 1998. In this period we were mainly active in the design of luxury yachts, design of building kits and building supervision.
From 2001 on Kleijweg Design has activities in the production of stainless steel hatches and pipelines for chemical tankers.
From 2004 on Kleijweg Design is succesfully designing, building and marketing the aluminium launch “Anne” and “Ottersloep”.
From 2005 on Kleijweg Design has her own yard facility for newbuilding, conversions and maintenance for yachts up to 15 metre.
Still Kleijweg Design is active in both pleasure craft and commercial vessels. Engineering tasks, feasability studies, naval architecture, damage stability calculations, building kits are some of our activities. A large diversity in types of vessels can be found in our reference list and the photogallery.
Our experience is the fundament for future projects.
At work at different locations;
different disciplines.
With over 300 project references it is too much to display here, but if you scroll down you will find a categorized list of our major projects.
Motor yachts |
||||||||
|
Name of vessel |
Year |
Length |
Breadth |
Depth |
Draft |
Speed |
Power |
Work executed |
| Opportunity | 2001- 2006 |
29.97 | 6.55 | 1.50 | 16″ | MTU 2×1100 kW | Hull survey; constructiondrawings; resistance & propulsion calculations; stabilitycalculations; design and delivery of a-frame and mast for navigationequipment; design of stabilisors including building kit; strengthcalculations | |
| Misha | 2001- 2005 |
19.70 | 5.86 | 1.30 | 23″ | MAN 2×515 kW | Classic-look modern semi-displacement cruiser worldwide; Complete hulldesign; structural design acc. to Lloyd’s Register; workshop drawings; building kit; plate expansions; resistance & propulsion calculations; engineering; building survey; stability calculations; | |
| Delactari | 2002 | 19.99 | 5.96 | 2.30 | MAN 250 kW | Steel trawler yacht with aluminium superstructure; features bulbous bow and portuguese bridge;complete hull design; structure design; plate expansions; building kit;workshop drawings; building survey; resistance & propulsioncalculations; stability calculations | ||
| Sissel | 2005 | 4.59 | 2.05 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 4″ | Elec. 0.75 kW | Design for aluminium launch withelectric outboard engine for rental services |
| Anne | 2004 | 7.50 | 2.06 | 0.30 | 5.6″ | Yamaha 8 HP | Aluminium Launch Anne; completedesign and production; built in own yard; | |
| Ottersloep I | 2005 | 7.50 | 2.06 | 0.35 | 6″ | Arka 3.6 kW | Very luxury version of “Anne” ,with some small modifications to the hull; equipped with galley,toilet, round seats and upholstery; propulsion by very efficientelectrical motor at 48V; power on board total of 360 Ah; hull painted;built in own yard | |
| Ottersloep II-V | 2006 | 7.50 | 2.06 | 0.35 | 6″ | Arka 3.6 kW | 4 repeats of “Ottersloep I” ,with some small modifications in details | |
| 27M | 2006 | 27.00 | 6.00 | 1.50 | MTU 2×1100 kW | Reconstruction of linesplan;tonnage calculation (GT) | ||
| Don Luca | 2007 | 32.00 | 6.79 | 3.53 | 2.13 | Classic motoryacht original De Vries Lentsch; Reconstruction of hull form by photogrammetry; generation of 3D hull form and linesplan | ||
| Lattitude | 2008/ 2009 |
43.50 | 8.40 | 4.26 | MTU 2x1800kW | Administrative Project management for Class (ABS) drawings and statutory requirements | ||
| Lady Dee | 2008 | 47.00 | 8.40 | 4.44 | MTU 2x1900kW | Hydrodynamics; estimation of resistance and propeller calculations; advice for linesplan changes; management of tanktests with Wolfson Unit; final report on propulsion and propellers | ||
| Swordfish | 2007/
2008 |
18.50 | 5.45 | 2.65 | 0.92 | Aluminium motoryacht, unfinished; On-sight project management; technical and financial; building survey; project aborted | ||
| Tethys | 2008 | 15.16 | 3.19 | 1.70 | 0.70 | SEATEK 2x590kW | High Performance raceboat; 3D modelling of existing hullform incl. rendering; powercalculations; interior design; general arrangement | |
| MY 43m | 2008 | 43.50 | 8.40 | 4.26 | Fuel consumption calculations, running on one engine | |||
| Balboa Explorer | 2008 | 40.25 | 9.00 | 5.10 | Conversion of fishing trawler to Expedition Motor Yacht. Advisor to owner; hydrostatics and damage stability calculations | |||
| AY 74 | 2009 | 22.85 | 6.20 | 1.60 | Volvo Penta 2x570kW | Hydrodynamics; resistance and propeller calculations for optimum propulsion in combination with engine and reduction gearbox selection; speed 24′ | ||
| MY 48m | 2009 | 48.15 | 8.79 | Caterpiller 3512C 2x1765kW | Optimization of linesplan; calculation of hydrodynamics, resistance; optimium propeller calculations; fuel consumption and range; single engine calculations | |||
| Nassima | 2010 | 49.18 | 8.79 | 2.35 | Caterpiller 3512C 2x1765kW | Calculation of hydrodynamics, resistance; optimium propeller calculations; fuel consumption and range | ||
| Anna | 2011 | 19.20 | 5.04 | 1.42 | Reconstruction of existing hullform by laser measurement; complete design of yacht; lengthening of existing hull by 3.60 mtr; linesplan; General arrangement Plan; construction drawings LR SSC; calculation of hydrostatics | |||
| Greenhorn | 2011 | In-house feasability study and design of a green motoryacht; estimation of the carbon footprint for the complete design- and production process; which is the best building material and building method; reduction of required energy; optimum use of alternative green resources; preliminary phase of design study is finished; CFD estimation; resistance and propulsion estimations | ||||||
Sailing yachts |
|||||||
|
Name of vessel |
Year |
Length |
Breadth |
Depth |
Draft |
SailArea |
Work executed |
| Puffin 40 kst | 1997 | 12.72 | 4.14 | 1.40 | 112 | Construction drawings | |
| Puffin 42 mst | 1998- 1999 |
12.72 | 4.14 | 1.10/245 | 112 | Construction drawings; building survey | |
| Puffin 42 mst | 2000 | 12.72 | 4.14 | 1.10/245 | 112 | Construction drawings; building survey; plate expansions and building kit | |
| Puffin 50 mst | 1998- 2000 |
14.95 | 4.95 | 1.35/3.10 | 168 | Building survey; construction drawings; plate expansions and building kit | |
| Shukimu | 2006 | 15.50 | 4.50 | - | - | 131 | Resistance and propulsion calculations; Sailing yacht with 14 knots top speed on engine power. |
| Koon Woon | 2001- 2003 |
16.75 | 4.82 | 2.65 | 168 | Survey of existing hull; redesign of aftship : transom, cockpit, deckhouse; interior design and construction drawings; building survey; sailplan design; stability calculations ISO12217 (CE); inclining testreport | |
| Little Zaca 50 | 2000 | 14.95 | 4.80 | 1.55/3.63 | 156 | Plate expansions; structural design acc. to Lloyd’s Register | |
| Liitle Zaca 73 | 2001- 2005 |
22.35 | 5.69 | 1.92/3.89 | 266 | Plate expansions; structural design acc. to Lloyd’s Register; Engineering of propulsion |
|
| Mouri | 2006 | 7.50 | 2.48 | 1.10 | 35 | Classic steel s-frame longkeel,bottle neck transom; complete refit; new design of sailplan; newelectrics, engine, rigging, sails, paint etc. Originally Dutch built1964. Re-launch 2007. | |
| Urania | 2002 | 23.40 | 6.04 | 2.50 | 310 | Construction drawings;structural design; workshop drawings; building kit; building survey | |
| Elisabeth | 2006 | 7.50 | 2.06 | 0.35/1.10 | 13.1 | Aluminium Launch Anne; complete design; built in own yard; sailing version with centre-board | |
| Optimist | 2007 | International class sailingdinghy; complete redesign and building in plywoord, all within Isafregulations; launch 2007 | |||||
| Stoute Hendrik | 2009 | 12.38 | 3.76 | 95.60 | Luxury sailing cutteryacht; Intact stability calculations ISO12217 (CE); inclining testreport | ||
Chemical Tankers |
||||||||
|
Name of vessel |
Year |
Length |
Breadth |
Depth |
Draft |
Tanks |
Deadweight |
Work executed
|
| Dissidentia | 2001/
2012 |
110.00 | 11.40 | 5.40 | 3.58 | 8 | Intact- and Damage stability ADNR; deadweightcheck; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Youri | 2004 | 110 | 11.40 | 5.05 | 3.55 | 9 | Damage stability; Longitudinal strength; deadweight check | |
| Ventura | 2005 | 110 | 11.00 | 4.80 | 3.40 | 8 | 2802 | Damage stability; Weight calculation; deadweight check |
| Synthese 20 | 2005 | 86 | 11.40 | 4.90 | 3.35 | 6 | 2071 | Damage stability; Weight calculation; deadweight check |
| Tanzanite | 2005/
2012 |
110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4290 | Estuary tanker; Damage stability MARPOL & ADNR; Inclining test + report; ; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Texas | 2005 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4226 | Estuary tanker; Damage stability MARPOL & ADNR; Inclining test + report |
| Primera | 2004 | 135 | 16.75 | 5.445 | 4.20 | 20 | 6768 | Damage stability; Weightcalculation; deadweight check; Delivery of all pipelines; ROSRsplit ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Proteus | 2004 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.14 | 3.60 | 11 | 3575 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; |
| Jade | 2004/
2011 |
135 | 20.00 | 6.00 | 4.60 | 28 | 9176 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck;
tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Emendo | 2004 | 124.85 | 11.40 | 5.23 | 3.50 | 11 | 3465 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Velocity | 2004 | 124.85 | 11.40 | 5.23 | 3.50 | 11 | 3459 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Va-banque | 2004 | 135.00 | 16.75 | 5.32 | 4.00 | 20 | 6460 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Gemini | 2004/
2012 |
110 | 11.40 | 5.40 | 3.50 | 9 | 2833 | Intact- and Damage stability ADNR; deadweightcheck; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Megan | 2006 | 86 | 11.41 | 5.32 | 3.60 | 7 | 2243 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| My Way | 2004 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4370 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Vancouver | 2004 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4285 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Vlissingen | 2003 | 135 | 21.50 | 6.15 | 4.40 | 14 | 9155 | Largest IWW tanker up to datewith 10150 m3 tankcapacity; Damage stability; deadweight check |
| Fatima | 2003/
2012 |
125 | 11.40 | 5.20 | 3.60 | 12 | 3539 | Intact- and Damage stability ADNR; deadweightcheck; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Titan | 2004 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4324 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Noordkaap | 2004/
2011 |
110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4321 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; ; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Barbara J jr. | 2004 | 86 | 9.45 | 4.25 | 2.80 | 5 | 1461 | Damage stability; |
| Olympic | 2005 | 110 | 11.40 | 5.85 | 4.10 | 11 | 3530 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Amalia | 2005 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4281 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Aviso II | 2005 | 110 | 11.35 | 5.05 | 3.55 | 9 | 3008 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation; tank sounding tables |
| Jana | 2004/
2012 |
81.15 | 9.46 | 4.20 | 2.80 | 4 | 1321 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Verona | 2005 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4266 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Constellation | 2006 | 125 | 11.40 | 5.20 | 3.65 | 12 | 3488 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation |
| Lynn 1 | 2005 | 95.55 | 11.40 | 5.47 | 3.30 | 7 | 2387 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Lynn 2 | 2005 | 76.45 | 11.40 | 5.47 | 3.40 | 7 | 2087 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Charis | 2005 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4389 | Damage stability |
| Solution | 2005 | 110 | 11.40 | 5.32 | 3.60 | 10 | 2965 | Damage stability |
| Ventura | 2005 | 110 | 11.00 | 4.80 | 3.40 | 8 | 2737 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation |
| Leonie Deyman | 2005 | 110 | 11.35 | 5.05 | 3.55 | 9 | 2940 | Damage stability; weightcalculation; tank sounding tables |
| Viking | 2005 | 81.30 | 10.15 | 4.68 | 3.20 | 6 | 1726 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck |
| Atlantic Power | 2006 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.50 | 12 | 4620 | Damage stability |
| Noordzee | 2005/
2012 |
110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | 4313 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Alexia | 2006 | 110 | 11.40 | 5.85 | 4.10 | 11 | 3597 | Damage stability |
| Elveba | 2006 | 99.95 | 14.45 | 5.90 | 4.42 | 12 | 4054 | Estuary tanker; Damage stability MARPOL & ADNR; Freeboard calculation |
| Breitling | 2006/
2012 |
110 | 13.50 | 5.68 | 4.50 | 12 | 4552 | Estuary tanker; Intact- and Damage stability MARPOL & ADNR; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Isis | 2001/2006 | 110 | 11.40 | 5.40 | 3.40 | 9 | 2708 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; 2006 : draft from 3.05 to 3.40 m & compliance with ADNR 2005 |
| Synthese 12 | 2006 | 86 | 11.35 | 4.90 | 3.35 | 6 | 2022 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation |
| Dissidentia | 2001 | 110 | 11.34 | 5.40 | 3.58 | 9 | 2850 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation |
| Valencia | 2006 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.32 | 4.50 | 12 | 4627 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; |
| Apollo | 2006/2007 | 135 | 17.50 | 6.11 | 4.50 | 12 | 7386 | IWW tanker with “Scheldehuid” construction; Damage stability; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Tolerantie | 2007 | 110 | 11.35 | 5.05 | 3.55 | 9 | 3019 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation |
| Atlantic Progress | 2007 | 135 | 17.55 | 5.97 | 4.95 | 24 | 8583 | Damage stability; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; Longitudinal strength; Gross Tonnage calculation |
| Money Maker II | 2007 | 125 | 11.40 | 4.92 | 3.50 | 10 | 3435 | Damage stability; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; weight calculation ; Longitudinal strength |
| Almira | 2006 | 110 | 11.40 | 5.85 | 3.98 | 11 | Damage stability | |
| Synthese 14 | 2007 | 86 | 11.40 | 4.90 | 3.35 | 6 | 2055 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation |
| Synthese 15 | 2008 | 86 | 10.50 | 4.60 | 3.12 | 5 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; weight calculation | |
| Achilles | 2011 | 110 | 11.40 | 5.32 | 3.66 | 5 | 3049 | tanker with “Scheldehuid” construction; Damage stability; deadweightcheck; |
| Promotion | 2008 | 135 | 17.50 | 6.10 | 5.04 | 12 | tanker with “Scheldehuid” construction; Damage stability; Longitudinal strength; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim | |
| Solution | 2009 | 110 | 13.50 | 5.80 | 4.40 | 13 | 4522 | Damage stability; deadweightcheck; Undocking calculation |
| Groenendaal | 2009 | 135 | 11.40 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4614 | Damage stability; Longitudinal strength; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweightcheck |
| New York | 2010 | 125 | 11.40 | 6.00 | 4.50 | Estuary tanker; seagoing max.waveheight=1.90m; intact stability; damage stability both seagoing and inland; inclining test including report; loading manuals; management of approval documents Belgium state and Bureau Veritas | ||
| Jean-Bart | 2008 | Loading- and discharging rate calculation | ||||||
| Stavordia | 2009 | 86 | 11.40 | 4.70 | 3.35 | 6 | Damage stability; deadweight check | |
| Mega Bunker Barge | 2008 | 147 | 22.80 | 13.00 | 11.50 | 30 | 28800 | Feasability study with regard to intact- and damage stability ADNR2007 |
| Seagoing tanker | 2008 | 101.60 | 12.00 | 7.00 | 4.90 | 3500 | Preliminary Linesplan and hydrostatics | |
| Va-Banque | 2004/
2011 |
135.00 | 16.75 | 5.32 | 4.00 | Damage stability; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | ||
| La Pareja | 2011 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.32 | 3.75 | 10 | 3180 | Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check |
| Myriam | 2009 | 122.50 | 13.55 | 5.80 | 4.48 | 15 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim | |
| Oase | 2010 | 124.82 | 11.44 | 5.23 | 3.60 | 11 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check | |
| Moby Dick | 2009 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.32 | 3.70 | 10 | Preliminary design of tanker with special propulsion named Whale Tail; General Arrangement Plan, Linesplan; management of tanktests at Marin for client; final report | |
| Coolsingel | 2009 | 86.00 | 11.45 | 5.32 | 3.74 | 7 | Damage stability; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; longitudinal strength; tank capacities; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Servus | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4500 | Damage stability; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Castor | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4500 | Damage stability; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Valk | 2009 | 49.86 | 6.60 | 5.13 | 6 | Type N-closed oil tanker; inspection on-board for load-rate and flow calculations | ||
| Arend | 2009 | 49.86 | 6.60 | 5.13 | 6 | Type N-closed oil tanker; inspection on-board for load-rate and flow calculations | ||
| Serano | 2009 | 110.00 | 13.50 | 5.80 | 4.40 | 13 | 4514 | Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; undocking calculations |
| Desperado | 2010 | 110.00 | 13.50 | 5.80 | 4.40 | 13 | 4514 | Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; undocking calculations |
| Catharina | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4614 | Damage stability; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; tank capacity tables; |
| Queste | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4623 | Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; tank capacity tables; |
| Paco | 2010 | 86.00 | 9.60 | 4.75 | 2.93 | 5 | 1535 | Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; weight calculation; tank capacity tables |
| North Carolina | 2009 | 124.82 | 11.45 | 5.23 | 3.60 | 11 | 3545 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check |
| South Carolina | 2009 | 124.82 | 11.45 | 5.23 | 3.60 | 11 | 3521 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check |
| Tim | 2010 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.32 | 3.75 | 10 | 3217 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; deadweight check |
| Banzystad | 2010 | 110.00 | 13.50 | 5.80 | 4.40 | 13 | 4576 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; Undocking calculations;Towing seatransport calculations; deadweight check |
| Myriam | 2010 | 122.53 | 13.54 | 5.80 | 4.48 | 15 | 5289 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; Undocking calculations;Towing seatransport calculations; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim;deadweight check |
| Stig90 | 2009 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4500 | Damage stability; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Diane | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4614 | Damage stability; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Charlois | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4614 | Damage stability; deadweight check; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Nomadisch III | 2010 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.32 | 3.73 | 5 | 3150 | IWW tanker with “Scheldehuid” construction; Intact and Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check |
| Stig72 | 2009 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.32 | 3.73 | 5 | 3150 | IWW tanker with “Scheldehuid” construction; Intact and Damage stability ADNR; |
| Dinara | 2010 | 124.82 | 11.45 | 5.23 | 3.60 | 11 | 3570 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check |
| Viraya | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | 4614 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Charis | 2010 | 110.00 | 13.54 | 5.32 | 4.20 | 12 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR | |
| Rojas | 2010 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.32 | 3.75 | 10 | 3173 | Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Eternity | 2010 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.32 | 3.75 | 10 | 3173 | Damage stability ADNR; deadweight check |
| Somtrans 25 | 2010 | 135.00 | 17.55 | 6.10 | 4.69 | 12 | 8040 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Somtrans 26 | 2010 | 135.00 | 17.55 | 6.10 | 4.69 | 12 | 8040 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim |
| Somtrans 20 | 2011 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 3.76 | 14 | 4614 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Somtrans 21 | 2011 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.00 | 14 | 4426 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Kalahari | 2010 | 110.00 | 13.54 | 5.80 | 4.40 | 13 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Desperado | 2010 | 110.00 | 13.54 | 5.80 | 4.40 | 13 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim | |
| Tristan | 2011 | 135.00 | 11.45 | 5.90 | 4.15 | 14 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Olympic | 2005/
2011 |
109.95 | 11.45 | 5.85 | 4.20 | 11 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Relationship | 2011 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.00 | 3.50 | 8 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Lynn I | 2005/
2011 |
95.45 | 11.40 | 5.47 | 3.40 | 7 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Lynn II | 2005/
2011 |
76.45 | 11.40 | 5.47 | 3.40 | 7 | Intact- and damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Walter Deymann | 2011 | 84.70 | 9.50 | 4.55 | 3.20 | 5 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Elise | 2011 | 84.82 | 9.60 | 4.80 | 3.50 | 5 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Relationship III | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.35 | 3.40 | 9 | 3720 | ex.Rudolf Deymann; Intact- and damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS |
| Tamariva | 2012/
2013 |
86.00 | 10.50 | 4.70 | 2.93 | 5 | Feasability study for increasing the draught; survey on-board; damage stability calculations ADNR; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Pegasus | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.30 | 3.22 | 2494 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Poseidon | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.30 | 3.22 | 2540 | Survey on-board; Intact- and damage stability ADNR; deadweight check; tank capacity tables; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Helena | 2012 | 80.00 | 9.50 | 4.15 | 2.99 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | ||
| Mariton | 2012 | 85.74 | 10.50 | 4.02 | 2.67 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | ||
| Montana | 2012 | 121.16 | 11.40 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 12 | Estuary tanker; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for loading computer EBIS | |
| Aphodite | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.20 | 3.20 | 9 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Somnium | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.30 | 3.40 | 8 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Raffael | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.42 | 3.42 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for ADNR loading computer EBIS | ||
| Desa | 2012 | 86.00 | 11.40 | 4.80 | 3.30 | 6 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for ADNR loading computer EBIS | |
| Serdon | 2012 | 85.35 | 11.40 | 4.00 | 3.20 | 5 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations for ADNR loading computer EBIS | |
| Rembrandt | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 4.85 | 3.22 | 10 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Rita | 2012 | 85.95 | 9.50 | 4.25 | 2.83 | 6 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Jutter | 2012 | 85.75 | 11.40 | 5.05 | 3.20 | 6 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Dissidentia | 2012 | 85.75 | 11.40 | 5.05 | 3.20 | 6 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Alberdina | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.90 | 3.45 | 9 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Velocity | 2012 | 124.85 | 11.45 | 5.23 | 3.50 | Feasability study for increase of draught; using method acc. to ADNR 2013 with the actual shifting of liquids | ||
| Beaufort | 2012 | 134.84 | 15.07 | 6.00 | 4.61 | 20 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Reimerswaal | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.40 | 5.30 | 3.41 | 9 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Caravaggio | 2012 | 109.70 | 11.39 | 5.40 | 2.23 | 9 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Bea | 2012 | 84.70 | 9.50 | 3.20 | 5 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | ||
| Pireaus | 2012 | 85.97 | 9.50 | 2.98 | 5 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | ||
| Goya | 2012 | 85.00 | 9.50 | 4.25 | 2.70 | 5 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Rijndectank I | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.02 | 3.67 | 9 | feasability study ADNR 2013 intact and damage stability; existing aft- and forebody of dry cargo vessel are used with a newbuilt cargopart; preliminary loading manual | |
| Vanora | 2012 | 70.00 | 11.41 | 4.25 | 2.95 | 17 | Type N oilsupply barge; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Victoria | 2012 | 70.00 | 11.41 | 4.25 | 2.95 | 17 | Type N oilsupply barge; tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Alukard | 2012 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 5.30 | 3.20 | 9 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Gilla | 2012 | 109.80 | 11.40 | 4.00 | 2.84 | 12 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Delshaven | 2013 | 69.91 | 9.50 | 4.17 | 4.05 | 8 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | |
| Aquilon | 2013 | 109.90 | 11.45 | 5.20 | 4.16 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | ||
| Eloise | 2013 | 86.00 | 11.41 | 5.32 | 3.80 | tank capacity tables; max.VCG calculations ADNR for loading computer EBIS | ||
Dry Cargo |
||||||||
|
Name of vessel |
Year |
Length |
Breadth |
Depth |
Draft |
Cargo |
Deadweight |
Work executed |
| Sereen | 1999 | 90.65 | 15 | 7.20 | 6.25 | 5000 | Survey of existing vessel (ex.Scorpio);Aftship with engineroom and accomodation will remain, complete new cargopart and foreship; Equiped for heavy cargo and ice-strengthening; Preliminary design; hull design; freeboard and tonnage (GT) calculations; intact stability; tank sounding tables,;SOLAS grain stability; probabilistic damage stability; longitudinal strength calculations; SOLAS flooding of engine room calculations;resistance & propulsion calculations | |
| Amberes | 2006 | 134 | 14.50 | 5.30 | 3.80 | 406 TEU | Gen.Cargo ship; freeboard calculations; probabilistic damage stability; inact stability; Damage stability ADNR, Rosr container calculations; supply of Loading computer | |
| River Hopper | 2001 | 63 | 7.20 | 3.05 | 2.99 | 48 TEU | 868 | Damen River Liner 720; Firstvessel designed for carriage of palletised cargo; Complete hull design;ROSR intact stability for carriage of containers and pallets;resistance & propulsion calculations; loading manuals; delivery ofon-board loading computer with specially designed loading software KSP(Kleijweg Stability Program) |
| Breuill | 2002 | 75 | 13.80 | 3.55 | 2.60 | RoRo vessel for the carriage ofthe Airbus A380 fuselage and wing parts on the river Garonne, Bordeaux,France. Complete hull design; preliminary general arragement plan;intact stability; resistance and propulsion | ||
| Estra Hopper | 2002 | 63.00 | 7.20 | 3.05 | 2.99 | 48 TEU | Damen River Liner 720; ROSR intact stability for carriage of containers | |
| Mironi | 2003 | 63 | 7.20 | 3.05 | 2.99 | 48 TEU | 868 | Repeat from ” River Hopper” with slightly adapted aftship; new construction drawings aftship and midship; building survey; |
| Eben Haezer I | 2003 | 99.75 | 14.15 | 4.80 | 3.80 | 238 TEU | Complete design to owner specification; hull design; arrangement plans; construction drawings;intact stability, ADNR damage stability | |
| Eben Haezer II | 2003 | 80.84 | 14.15 | 4.80 | 3.80 | 220 TEU | see ” Eben Haezer I” , push pontoon. | |
| Dintel Hopper | 2003 | 63 | 7.00 | 3.10 | 2.86 | 32 TEU | 848 | Inclining test; calculation of light ship; complete new Rosr intact stability booklet; KSP on-boardloading computer |
| Donge Hopper | 2003 | 63 | 7.00 | 3.10 | 3.01 | 32 TEU | 913 | complete new Rosr intact stability booklet; KSP on-board loading computer |
| Amer Hopper | 2003 | 63 | 7.00 | 3.10 | 2.11 | 32 TEU | 552 | complete new Rosr intact stability booklet; KSP on-board loading computer |
| Mark Hopper | 2003 | 63 | 7.00 | 3.10 | 2.11 | 32 TEU | 552 | complete new Rosr intact stability booklet; KSP on-board loading computer |
| Schelde Express | 2001 | 110 | 12.50 | 4.30 | 4.00 | ADNR damage stability | ||
| MONRO-E | 2000 | 110 | 11.40 | 3.20 | 2.25 | 116 TEU | 1140 | Feasability study andpreliminary design of fast (22 km/h upstream) RoRo container vessel |
| Michaelangelo | 2007 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.60 | 272 TEU | 3945 | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check |
| Janna-Maria | 2007 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.60 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check | |
| Narvik | 2007 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.60 | 272 | 4042 | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check |
| Monaco | 2007 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.70 | 272 | Redesign of bulkheads with repsect to damage stability ADNR | |
| Liga | 2008 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.58 | 256 | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; Longitudinal strength | |
| Sierra | 2008 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.65 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check | |
| Transferium | 2009 | 97.28 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.50 | 126 TEU | Container vessel with loading crane; Intact stability and damage stability Rosr; stability during (un)loading with crane; deadweight check | |
| Ecuador | 2009 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.67 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check | |
| Lahringen | 2009 | 110 | 11.40 | 3.65 | 3.55 | 208 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; deadweight check | |
| Transito | 2009 | 76.50 | 11.40 | 3.585 | 3.58 | 156 TEU | Push barge; intact stability ROSR | |
| Sandra W | 2008 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.67 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; weight calculations | |
| Hendrik | 2010 | 135 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.67 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; weight calculations; tank capacity tables | |
| Avila | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.60 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; weight calculations; tank capacity tables | |
| Papillon | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.60 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; weight calculations; tank capacity tables | |
| Flinterstream | 2009 | 129.40 | 17.00 | 10.00 | 7.10 | 8850 tdw | Multi purpose dry cargo vessel with deckcranes; inclining testreport | |
| Fidato | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.60 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; weight calculations; tank capacity tables | |
| Longhopper | 2009 | 86/87 | 7.05 | 3.10 | 3.02 | 47 TEU | 1300 | Feasability study of containervessel; lengthening of existing hopper vessels with 13 and 14 metre; stability calculations ROSR for carrying containers |
| Stig115 | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.67 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; weight calculations; | |
| Gambler | 2010 | 135.00 | 11.40 | 4.25 | 3.67 | 272 TEU | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR; damage stability ADNR; ROSR split ship calculations for ships above Mannheim; deadweight check; weight calculations; | |
| Ferox | 2010 | 63.00 | 7.20 | 3.05 | 2.99 | 48 TEU | Damen River Liner 720; Stability investigation | |
| Jager | 2010 | 69.96 | 7.25 | 2.98 | 2.88 | 32 TEU | 1038 | Containervessel; intact stability ROSR loading manual |
| Euroports | 2011 | 134.26 | 14.50 | 5.70 | 3.60 | Estuary container vessel; Damage stability MARPOL & ADNR; Inclining test + report; intact stability ROSR; loading manual; weight calculation; drawing container arrangement plan; tank capacity tables; delivery of loading computer software | ||
| Linge Hopper | 2010 | 63.00 | 7.00 | 3.10 | 2.80 | 48 TEU | Feasability study for caariage of maximum number of containers | |
| Ortega 4 | 2011 | 89.60 | 11.43 | 4.33 | 3.85 | 144 TEU | Push Barge; intact stability Rosr for the carriage of containers | |
| Samoreus | 2011 | 62.50 | 7.50 | 3.05 | 2.70 | Feasability study for the transport of 416 ton project cargo | ||
Miscellaneous vessels (passenger vessels; workboats etc) |
||||||||
|
Name of vessel |
Year |
Length |
Breadth |
Depth |
Draft |
Cargo |
Deadweight |
Work executed |
| Scan Warrior | 2004 | 52.35 | 11.43 | 4.73 | 4.18 | 463 | Strength calculations for the fitting of an A-frame on this existing survey vessel; construction drawings for strengthening of the aftdeck; direct calculations for the strength of the a-frame including dynamic effects in heavy seas. | |
| Pilot | ||||||||
| Fortuna | 2000 | 34.20 | 7.10 | 2.80 | 1.42 | 200 pass. | IWW Passenger vessel; BSB zone2; intact stability & damage stability | |
| Supply Lander | 1997 | 64.60 | 14.00 | 3.55 | 1.80 | 640 | Landing craft with triple engine propulsion; resistance & propulsion calculations | |
| Dolfijn | 2002 | 83.50 | 11.40 | 4.65 | 4.00 | Tank push barge; hull design;linesplan | ||
| Roos | 2005 | 10.60 | 2.07 | 0.75 | 0.20 | 30 pass. | Classic Dutch flat barge forsmall waters; complete design; Equipped acc. to BSB zone 4 requirementsfor commercial passengervessel; approved by Dutch Shipping Inpectorate | |
| Rosalie | 2005 | 11.15 | 2.22 | 0.75 | 0.20 | 30 pass. | Redesign of the ” Roos” ; alittle larger to accomodate 12 passengers in wheelchair; equippedwith hydraulic lift; approved by Dutch Shipping Inpectorate | |
| Jelaro | 2006 | 11.15 | 2.22 | 0.75 | 0.20 | 30 pass. | Exact sister vessel of “Rosalie” | |
| Noordborg | 2006 | 48.55 | 7.94 | 3.24 | 2.98 | 518 | Survey of classic Dutch cargovessel; no longer in service; Feasability study for completerestoration into an historic industrial inheritance | |
| Salem | 2009 | 77.00 | 20.20 | 6.35 | 3.93 | 60 pass. | Offshore support vessel with crane and accomodation; Gross Tonnage calculation; inclining testreport; intact- and damage stability calculations (IMO); loading manual; | |
| Emotion | 2008 | 110 | 11.40 | 4.85 | 3.65 | 122 pass. | Rhine passenger vessel; weight calculation; intact and damage stability Rosr | |
| Brilliance | 2009 | 110 | 11.40 | 116 pass. | Rhine passenger vessel; plate expansions for building kit of forward part deckhouse | |||
| Transit II | 2009 | 79.00 | 11.41 | 3.60 | 3.00 | Double hull container push Barge. Reconstruction of linesplan; calculation of damage to foreship | ||
| Amfibike | 2011 | 8 pass. | Innovative Design of amphibious vehicle for 8 persons; building specification; green design, with minimal use of resources and minimum carbon footprint; persons have to pedal on land; in water electric propulsion; solar supported and energy recycling system | |||||
| Gas tanker | 2010 | 110.00 | 11.45 | 3.65 | 2.90 | 6 tnks | 1988 | Gastanker IWW, rebuilt of existing dry cargo vessels; intact and damage stability ADNR |
| Reni | 2011 | 14.37 | 3.12 | 0.95 | 0.42 | 50 pass. | Open passenger vessel for city tours; General Arrangement; intact stability; Building specification; Costs estimate; | |
| Keereweer | 2012 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 12 pass. | Veerpontje voor wandelaars en fietsters; onderzoeksrapport stabiliteit naar aanleiding van ongeluk | |
